(Continuação daqui)
3. Chilling effect
The Court found that the statements had been part of a broad critique on links between politics and public administration and as such had not been statements of facts. As a result both the conviction and the penalties imposed, which would have had a “chilling effect” on freedom of expression, had been manifestly disproportionate.
Fonte: cf. aqui
(Continua acolá)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário